闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧湱鈧懓瀚崳纾嬨亹閹烘垹鍊炲銈嗗笂缁€渚€宕滈鐑嗘富闁靛牆妫楁慨褏绱掗悩鍐茬伌闁绘侗鍣ｆ慨鈧柕鍫濇閸樻捇鏌℃径灞戒沪濠㈢懓妫濆畷婵嗩吋閸℃劒绨婚梺鍝勫€搁悘婵嬵敂椤愩倗纾奸弶鍫涘妽瀹曞瞼鈧娲樼敮鎺楋綖濠靛鏁勯柦妯侯槷婢规洟姊洪崨濠勭細闁稿孩濞婇幆灞解枎閹惧鍘遍梺鍝勬储閸斿矂鎮橀悩鐢电＜闁绘瑢鍋撻柛銊ョ埣瀵濡搁埡鍌氫簽闂佺ǹ鏈粙鎴︻敂閿燂拷
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹瀹勬噴褰掑炊椤掑鏅悷婊冪箻閸┾偓妞ゆ帊鑳堕埢鎾绘煛閸涱垰鈻堥柕鍡曠閳诲酣骞橀崘鎻掓暏婵＄偑鍊栭幐楣冨磻閻斿吋鍋橀柕澶嗘櫆閳锋垿鏌涢敂璇插箹闁告柨顑嗛妵鍕Ω閵夛箑娅ф繝銏ｎ潐濞叉ḿ鎹㈠┑鍡╂僵妞ゆ挾濮撮獮宥夋⒒娴ｅ憡鍟為柟绋挎瀹曘劑顢橀悪鈧崑褔姊婚崒娆戝妽濠电偛锕銊╂焼瀹ュ懎鐎梺鍓插亝濞叉牗顢婇梻浣告啞濞诧箓宕归幍顔句笉婵炴垯鍨洪悡鏇㈡煙閹规劕鐨洪柛鏂跨Ч閺屾稓鈧絾鏌ㄥú锕傚煕閹寸姷妫い鎾跺仦閸ｇ儤銇勯妷銉█闁哄矉缍侀崺銉╁幢濡厧鍑�
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴ｅГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵姘ㄧ槐鎾诲磼濞嗘帒鍘＄紓渚囧櫘閸ㄨ泛鐣峰┑鍠棃宕橀妸銉т喊闂備礁鎼崯顐︽偋婵犲洤纾瑰┑鐘崇閻撱垺淇婇娆掝劅婵″弶鎮傞弻锝嗘償椤旂厧绫嶅┑顔硷龚濞咃絿鍒掑▎鎾崇閹兼番鍨虹€氬磭绱撻崒娆戣窗闁哥姵鐗滅划鏃堝醇閺囩偟鍔﹀銈嗗笂閼冲爼銆傞懠顑藉亾閸忓浜鹃梺褰掓？缁€渚€鎷戦悢鍏肩叆闁绘柨鎼瓭闂佺粯鍔曢敃顏堝蓟瀹ュ棙濮滈柣妤€鐗滃Ο鍌氣攽閻愯尙鐒惧ù婊庝簻椤繘鎼归崷顓犵厯闂佸壊鐓堥崰鏍掗幇鐗堚拺闁荤喐婢樺▓鈺呮煙閸戙倖瀚�
缂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁炬儳缍婇弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲梺姹囧€ら崰妤呭Φ閸曨垰鍐€妞ゆ劦婢€缁爼姊洪幖鐐插闁稿﹤娼″璇测槈閵忊剝娅嗛柣鐘叉处瑜板啰绮昏ぐ鎺撯拺闁硅偐鍋涙俊鐣岀磼鐠囪尙澧︾€殿喛顕ч埥澶愬閻樻鍟嬮梻浣藉亹閳峰牓宕滃▎鎰箚濞寸姴顑嗛悡鐔煎箹濞ｎ剙鐏い锝堝皺閳ь剙鍘滈崑鎾绘煙闂傚顦﹂柦鍐枑缁绘盯骞嬪▎蹇曚患缂備胶濮风划顖涚┍婵犲洦鍊峰Λ鐗堢箓濞堫厽绻涚€涙ḿ鐭掔紒鐘崇墪椤繐煤椤忓嫪绱堕梺鍛婃处閸橀箖宕濊ぐ鎺撯拺闁荤喐婢樺▓鈺呮煙閸戙倖瀚�
濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴ｆ閺嬩線鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽绮换娑㈠箣閺冣偓閸ゅ秹鏌涢妷顔煎⒒闁轰礁娲弻鏇＄疀閺囩倫銉︺亜閿旇娅嶉柟顔筋殜瀹曟寰勬繝浣割棜闂傚倷绀侀幉鈥趁洪敃鍌氱；濠㈣埖鍔曢弰銉╂煟閹邦剦鍤熺紒鐘荤畺閹鎮介惂鑽ゆ嚀閻☆厽淇婇悙顏勨偓鏍垂闂堟党娑樷攽閸℃瑦娈鹃梺鍝勬川閸嬬喖寮抽崱娑欑厱闁哄洢鍔屾晶顔济归悪鈧崹璺侯潖濞差亜绠归柣鎰絻婵埖绻涚€涙ḿ鐭嬬紒顔芥崌楠炲棝宕橀鑺ュ劒闂侀潻瀵岄崢楣冩晬濠婂嫮绡€闁靛骏绲介悡鎰磼鐎ｎ偄绗ч柍褜鍓氶悢顒勫箯閿燂拷
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柣鎴ｅГ閸ゅ嫰鏌ら崫銉︽毄濞寸姵姘ㄧ槐鎾诲磼濞嗘帒鍘＄紓渚囧櫘閸ㄨ泛鐣峰┑鍠棃宕橀妸銉т喊闂備礁鎼崯顐︽偋婵犲洤纾瑰┑鐘崇閻撱垺淇婇娆掝劅婵″弶鎮傞弻锝嗘償椤旂厧绫嶅┑顔硷龚濞咃絿鍒掑▎鎾崇閹兼番鍨虹€氭娊姊绘担鍛婂暈闁告梹锚閻ｇ兘妫冨ù绛圭秮楠炲洭鎮ч崼鐔哥彸濠电姰鍨煎▔娑㈩敄閸ヮ剙鍌ㄩ梺顒€绉甸埛鎴︽煛閸屾ê鍔滄繛鍛嚇閺屾盯鎮ゆ担闀愬枈閻庤娲滈弫濠氥€佸Δ鍛妞ゆ帒鍊搁獮鍫ユ⒒娓氣偓濞佳囨偋閸℃瑦宕查柟瀵稿Л閸嬫挸顫濋悙顒€顏�
Passage 1
A divide between aesthetic and technical considerations has played a crucial role in mapmaking and cartographic scholarship. Since nineteenth century cartographers, for instance, understood themselves as technicians who did not care about visual effects, while others saw themselves as landscape painters. That dichotomy structured the discipline of the history of cartography. Until the 1980s, in what Blakemore and Harley called “the Old is Beautiful Paradigm,” scholars largely focused on maps made before 1800, marveling at their beauty and sometimes regretting the decline of the pre-technical age. Early mapmaking was considered art while modern cartography was located within the realm of engineering utility. Alpers, however, has argued that this boundary would have puzzled mapmakers in the seventeenth century, because they considered themselves to be visual engineers.
1. According to the passage, Alpers would say that the assumptions underlying the “paradigm” were
A. inconsistent with the way some mapmakers prior to 1800 understand their own work
B. dependent on a seventeenth-century conception of mapmaking visual engineering
C. unconcerned with the difference between the aesthetic and technical questions of mapmaking
D. insensitive to divisions among cartographers working in the period after 1800
E. supported by the demonstrable technical superiority of mapmaking made after 1800
2. It can be inferred from the passage that, beginning in the 1980s, historians of cartography
A. placed greater emphasis on the beauty of maps made after 1800
B. expanded their range of study to include more material created after 1800
C. grew more sensitive to the way mapmakers prior to 1800 conceived of their work
D. came to see the visual details of maps as aesthetic objects rather than practical cartographic aids
E. reduced the attention they paid to the technical aspects of mapmaking
答案：A B
A divide between aesthetic and technical considerations has played a crucial role in mapmaking and cartographic scholarship. Since nineteenth century cartographers, for instance, understood themselves as technicians who did not care about visual effects, while others saw themselves as landscape painters. That dichotomy structured the discipline of the history of cartography. Until the 1980s, in what Blakemore and Harley called “the Old is Beautiful Paradigm,” scholars largely focused on maps made before 1800, marveling at their beauty and sometimes regretting the decline of the pre-technical age. Early mapmaking was considered art while modern cartography was located within the realm of engineering utility. Alpers, however, has argued that this boundary would have puzzled mapmakers in the seventeenth century, because they considered themselves to be visual engineers.
1. According to the passage, Alpers would say that the assumptions underlying the “paradigm” were
A. inconsistent with the way some mapmakers prior to 1800 understand their own work
B. dependent on a seventeenth-century conception of mapmaking visual engineering
C. unconcerned with the difference between the aesthetic and technical questions of mapmaking
D. insensitive to divisions among cartographers working in the period after 1800
E. supported by the demonstrable technical superiority of mapmaking made after 1800
2. It can be inferred from the passage that, beginning in the 1980s, historians of cartography
A. placed greater emphasis on the beauty of maps made after 1800
B. expanded their range of study to include more material created after 1800
C. grew more sensitive to the way mapmakers prior to 1800 conceived of their work
D. came to see the visual details of maps as aesthetic objects rather than practical cartographic aids
E. reduced the attention they paid to the technical aspects of mapmaking
答案：A B
- 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌ｉ幋锝呅撻柛銈呭閺屻倝宕妷锔芥瘎婵炲濮靛銊ф閹捐纾兼繛鍡樺笒閸橈紕绱撴笟鍥ф珮闁搞劏娉涢悾宄扳攽閸狀喗妫冨畷姗€濡搁妷褌鍠婇梻鍌欑閹碱偊宕锔藉亱濠电姴娲ょ壕鐟扳攽閻樺磭顣查柣鎾卞灪娣囧﹪顢涘▎鎺濆妳濠碘€冲级閹倿寮婚敐鍡樺劅妞ゆ梻鍘х猾宥呪攽椤旂》榫氭繛鍜冪悼閸掓帒鈻庨幘宕囶唶闁瑰吋鐣崹铏光偓姘－缁辨捇宕掑▎鎴ｇ獥闂佸摜濮甸悧婊呭垝閺冨牆閱囬柡鍥╁仧閸旓箑顪冮妶鍡楃瑐闁煎啿鐖奸妴鍌炴嚑椤戣棄浜鹃柛蹇擃槸娴滈箖姊鸿ぐ鎺擄紵缂佲偓娓氣偓閹锋垿鎮㈤崗鑲╁弳闂佺粯鏌ㄩ幖顐㈢摥闂備胶绮崝鏇㈡晝椤忓牆钃熺€广儱妫欐慨婊堟煟濡も偓閻楁粌螣閸屾埃鏀介柣鎰皺閻掓儳霉濠婂簼绨绘い顐㈢箻閹煎綊宕烽鐘靛幆闂備礁澹婇悡鍫ュ窗閺嶎灝鎺楀箛閻楀牃鎷洪梺鑽ゅ枑濠㈡ê鈻撻埡鍛厵闁告垯鍊栫€氾拷
- 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽鎳撻—鍐偓锝庝簻椤掋垺銇勯幇顏嗙煓闁哄被鍔戦幃銏ゅ传閸曟垯鍨婚惀顏堝箚瑜滈悡濂告煛鐏炲墽娲寸€殿喗鎸虫俊鎼佸Ψ瑜夐崑鎾活敆閸曨剛鍘遍梺闈涱樈閸犳牗鏅堕鍓х＜闁绘瑢鍋撻柛鐘虫皑濡叉劙骞掗幋鏃€顫嶅┑顔筋殔濡宕滈柆宥嗏拺闁告繂瀚刊鐓幟瑰⿰搴濋偗妤犵偛鍟灃闁告劏鏅涢弸鍌炴⒑閸涘﹥澶勯柛鎾寸洴钘濋柕澶堝劗閺€浠嬫煟閹伴偊鏉洪柛銈咁儏閳规垿鍨鹃搹顐㈡灎闂佺硶鏂侀崑鎾愁渻閵堝棗绗傞柣鎺炵畵閹啴骞嬮悩鐢碉紲濡炪倖娲栭幊搴ㄦ倶閿曗偓閳规垿鏁嶉崟顒佹瘓閻庤娲滈崰鏍€佸☉姗嗘僵濡插本鐗曢弲顏堟⒒娴ｇ瓔鍤欓梺甯到宀ｈ儻顦规鐐搭殔楗即宕奸悢铚傛偅婵犵數鍋涘Ο濠冪濠靛鍋傞柣鏃傚帶缁犺绻涢敐搴″闁诲浚鍣ｉ弻娑㈡偄閸濄儱寮ㄩ梺鍝勭灱閸犳牕鐣峰▎鎾澄ч柛鈩冾殢娴硷拷
- 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌ｉ幋锝呅撻柛銈呭閺屻倝宕妷锔芥瘎婵炲濮靛銊ф閹捐纾兼繛鍡樺笒閸橈紕绱撴笟鍥ф珮闁搞劏娉涢悾宄扳攽閸狀喗妫冨畷姗€濡搁妷褌鍠婇梻鍌欑閹碱偊宕锔藉亱濠电姴娲ょ壕鐟扳攽閻樺磭顣查柣鎾卞灪娣囧﹪顢涘▎鎺濆妳濠碘€冲级閹倿寮婚敐鍡樺劅妞ゆ梻鍘х猾宥呪攽椤旂》榫氭繛鍜冪悼閸掓帒鈻庨幘宕囶唶闁瑰吋鐣崹铏光偓姘▕濮婄粯鎷呴崨濠傛殘闂佸憡姊归敋闁伙絿鍏樺Λ鍐圭粵鍦М妤犵偛娲幃褔宕奸悢鍝ュ礁婵犵數濮伴崹鐓庘枖濞戙埄鏁勯柛銉墮閸屻劑姊洪鈧粔鐢稿煕閹达附鐓涢柛灞久崝婊勭箾閸涱厽鍤囬柡灞剧洴閹倖鎷呴梹鎰瀳闁诲氦顫夊ú婊堝极婵犳哎鈧礁螖閸涱厾顦板銈嗗笒閸婃悂鐛崼銉︹拻濞撴埃鍋撴繛浣冲洦鍋嬮柛鈩冪懄瀹曟煡鏌熺€电ǹ袥闁稿鎸搁～婵嬫倷椤掆偓椤忥拷
- 婵犵數濮烽弫鍛婃叏閻戣棄鏋侀柛娑橈攻閸欏繘鏌ｉ幋锝嗩棄闁哄绶氶弻鐔兼⒒鐎靛壊妲紒鎯у⒔缁垳鎹㈠☉銏犵闁哄啠鍋撻柛銈呯Ч閺屾盯濡烽鐓庘拻闂佽桨绀佸ú顓㈠蓟閺囷紕鐤€闁哄洨鍊妷锔轰簻闁挎棁顕у▍宥夋煙椤旂瓔娈滅€规洘顨嗗鍕節娴ｅ壊妫滈梻鍌氬€风粈渚€骞夐垾瓒佹椽鏁冮崒姘憋紱婵犮垼鍩栭崝鏇㈠及閵夆晜鐓熼柟閭﹀墻閸ょ喓绱掗悩鑽ょ暫闁诡喗顨婇幃浠嬫儌閼姐倖鍤€闁烩槅鍘芥穱濠囨倷椤忓嫧鍋撻弽顓炲瀭闂傚牊鍏氬☉妯锋斀闁糕剝鐟﹀▓楣冩⒑閸濆嫭宸濋柛瀣枛瀵娊宕卞☉娆戝幈闂佸搫娲㈤崝灞炬櫠椤旀祹褰掓偑閳ь剟宕圭捄渚綎婵炲樊浜滅粻褰掓煟閹邦厼绲诲┑顔垮煐缁绘稓鈧稒岣块惌瀣磼椤旇姤宕屾鐐叉瀹曟﹢顢欓懞銉ュ姃闂備線娼荤€靛矂宕㈡ィ鍐╂櫖婵犲﹤瀚弧鈧梺闈涢獜缁蹭粙鎮￠幇顔剧＜閻庯綆鍋勭粭褔鏌嶈閸撴岸鎮㈤鍕闁跨噦鎷�
- 闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾归柟闂寸绾惧綊鏌ｉ幋锝呅撻柛銈呭閺屻倝宕妷锔芥瘎婵炲濮靛銊ф閹捐纾兼繛鍡樺笒閸橈紕绱撴笟鍥ф珮闁搞劏娉涢悾宄扳攽閸狀喗妫冨畷姗€濡搁妷褌鍠婇梻鍌欑閹碱偊宕锔藉亱濠电姴娲ょ壕鐟扳攽閻樺磭顣查柣鎾卞灪娣囧﹪顢涘▎鎺濆妳濠碘€冲级閹倿寮婚敐鍡樺劅妞ゆ梻鍘х猾宥呪攽椤旂》榫氭繛鍜冪悼閸掓帒鈻庨幘宕囶唶闁瑰吋鐣崹铏光偓姘▕濮婄粯鎷呴崨濠傛殘闂佸憡姊归敋闁伙絿鍏樺Λ鍐圭粵鍦М妤犵偛娲幃褔宕奸悢鍝ュ礁闂傚倷鑳剁涵鍫曞礈濠靛枹鍝勨堪閸涱垯绗夊┑顔斤供閸擄箑銆掓繝姘厪闁割偅绻冮ˉ鐘差熆瑜滈崜娑氭閹烘梹瀚氶柟缁樺笚濞堣顪冮妶鍐ㄧ仾婵☆偄鍟撮獮鍐煛閸涱喗鍎銈嗗姂閸ㄨ瀵兼惔銏㈢瘈婵炲牆鐏濋弸鐔搞亜閵娿儲鍤囬柟顔ㄥ嫮绡€闁告洏鍔屾禍鐐叏濡厧浜鹃悗姘炬嫹
GRE闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹妞嬪海鐭嗗〒姘ｅ亾妤犵偞鐗犻、鏇氱秴闁搞儺鍓﹂弫宥夋煟閹邦厽缍戝ù婊堜憾濮婅櫣鍖栭弴鐐测拤缂備礁顑嗛崹鍦垝婵犳碍鍋愰悹鍥皺椤旀劙姊洪崷顓涙嫛闁告﹢绠栧畷銏犫槈閵忥紕鍘告繛杈剧到婢瑰﹪宕曢弮鍌楀亾濞堝灝鏋涢柣鏍帶閻ｇ兘鎮℃惔顔藉兊濡炪倖鎸鹃崰鎾广亹閸℃稒鈷戦悹鍥ㄥ絻椤掋垻鐥弶璺ㄐ㈤柣锝嗙箞楠炴牗鎷呭灞炬啺婵犵數鍋為崹顖炲垂閸︻厾涓嶇紓浣姑肩换鍡涙煟閹伴偊鏉洪柛銈嗙懃闇夋繝濠傜墢閻ｇ儤鎱ㄦ繝鍐┿仢鐎规洦鍋婂畷鐔碱敇閻樻彃蝎闂傚倷鑳堕幊鎾诲吹閺嶎厼绠柨鐕傛嫹
闂傚倸鍊搁崐鎼佸磹閹间礁纾瑰瀣捣閻棗霉閿濆牊顏犵紒鈧繝鍌楁斀闁绘ê寮堕幖鎰磽娴ｅ弶娅婄€殿喖鐖煎畷鐓庮潩椤撶喓褰囬梻浣规た閸樹粙鎮烽埡鍛摕闁绘梻鍘х粻鏌ユ煙娴煎瓨娑ф繛鍫弮濮婃椽宕崟闈涘壆缂備浇鍩栧畝绋款嚕婵犳碍鍋勯柣鎾虫捣椤斿姊洪柅娑樺祮婵炰匠鍐ｆ灁妞ゆ挾鍋愰弨浠嬫煃閽樺顥滃ù婊勭箞閺屻劑寮村Ο铏逛紙濡ょ姷鍋涢崯顐︽偩閿熺姴绠ラ柧蹇ｅ亞閳ь剙顭峰Λ鍛搭敃閵忊€愁槱闂佺懓鐨烽弲婊呪偓鐢靛帶閻ｆ繈宕熼鑺ュ闂佽崵鍋炵粙鍫ュ焵椤掆偓閸樻牗绔熼弴銏♀拻濞达綀濮ょ涵鍫曟煕閿濆繒鐣垫鐐茬箻閺佹捇鏁撻敓锟�濠电姷鏁告慨鐑藉极閸涘﹥鍙忛柣鎴ｆ閺嬩線鏌熼梻瀵割槮缁惧墽绮换娑㈠箣閺冣偓閸ゅ秹鏌涢妷顔煎⒒闁轰礁娲弻鏇＄疀閺囩倫銉︺亜閿旇娅嶉柟顔筋殜瀹曟寰勬繝浣割棜闂傚倷绀侀幉鈥趁洪敃鍌氱；濠㈣埖鍔曢弰銉╂煟閹邦喖鍔嬮柍閿嬪灥闇夐柛蹇氬亹閹冲懘鏌涢幒宥呭祮闁哄矉绻濆畷濂割敃閵忕媭娼鹃梻渚€鈧偛鑻晶顖滅棯閺夎法孝闁伙絾绻堥獮鏍ㄦ媴濮濆本鎲伴梻浣芥硶閸犳挻鎱ㄩ幘顔藉€峰┑鐘叉处閻撳啴寮堕悙闈涱暭妞わ箓鏀辩换娑樼暆婵犱線鍋楀┑顔硷龚濞咃絿鍒掑▎鎾冲瀭妞ゆ柨鍚嬮惁锝夋⒒娴ｇ儤鍤€闁搞倖鐗犻獮蹇涙晸閿燂拷
